AITA for telling my husband I’m done being intimate until he loses the beer belly he gained after marriage?

Welcome back, dear readers, to another dive into the complicated world of relationships! Today's story tackles a particularly touchy subject: how physical changes after marriage can impact intimacy. It’s a reality many couples face, where the honeymoon glow gives way to a more settled routine, and sometimes, a few extra pounds. But when does 'loving me for me' cross the line into neglecting one's partner's attraction?
Our Original Poster (OP) is struggling with her husband's post-wedding weight gain and has reached a drastic measure. She's put intimacy on hold until he addresses his 'beer belly'. Is she being shallow and manipulative, or is she simply advocating for her needs and the health of their relationship? Let's unpack this thorny issue together and see what the internet has to say.

"AITA for telling my husband I’m done being intimate until he loses the beer belly he gained after marriage?"




The realm of physical attraction within a long-term relationship is incredibly complex and deeply personal. It's not uncommon for partners' bodies to change over time, and with that, their preferences or levels of attraction might also evolve. While some argue that true love transcends physical appearance, it's also a valid truth that physical attraction plays a significant role in many people's desire for intimacy. The OP's feelings are her own and can't be simply dismissed.
From the husband's perspective, this situation must feel like a profound betrayal. He likely believed that his wife loved him unconditionally and that 'happy weight' was an acceptable part of settled married life. To be told that intimacy is contingent on his physical appearance can be deeply hurtful and can feel like body shaming, potentially eroding his self-esteem and trust in the relationship. This could lead to resentment, regardless of whether he chooses to lose weight or not.
However, the OP's narrative suggests she tried gentler approaches for a significant period. Her concern wasn't just aesthetic; it also touched on health and the perceived lack of effort. When communication attempts are repeatedly dismissed, a partner might feel they have no option but to resort to more drastic measures to be heard. While the ultimatum is severe, it stems from a place of feeling unheard and a legitimate decline in her own desire and attraction.
The core issue here is not just the weight gain, but the communication breakdown that led to such a drastic ultimatum. Withholding intimacy as a condition for physical change, while a direct tactic, often backfires. It can damage emotional intimacy and create a transactional dynamic that is hard to recover from. While OP has a right to her feelings of attraction, the method she chose might inflict long-lasting scars on their marriage, pushing them further apart rather than closer.
Weighing In: Readers React to the Intimacy Ultimatum!
The comments section on this one was, as expected, a fiery battleground of opinions! Many readers empathized with OP, arguing that attraction is vital for intimacy and that her husband had ignored her concerns for too long. They highlighted the importance of mutual effort in a relationship, including maintaining some level of physical care for one's partner and oneself. These commenters often echoed the sentiment that her husband's dismissiveness was the real problem.
On the flip side, a significant number of commenters slammed OP for what they perceived as manipulative and conditional love. They pointed out that using intimacy as leverage can be incredibly damaging, bordering on emotional abuse, and sets a dangerous precedent for their marriage. The consensus was divided, showcasing the deep complexities of attraction, communication, and expectation within a partnership, with no easy answers.





This AITA story serves as a stark reminder that relationships require continuous effort, open communication, and mutual respect, even when it comes to sensitive topics like physical appearance and intimacy. While the OP's feelings of decreased attraction are valid, the chosen method of an ultimatum sparked a contentious debate. It highlights the fine line between advocating for one's needs and potentially causing deep emotional harm. Ultimately, honest conversations, perhaps with professional help, often prove more constructive than ultimatums in navigating these complex relationship waters. What would you have done in this situation?

