AITA for planting fake financial evidence in my coworker’s company email, then tipping off management anonymously so she was fired and I took her position?

Welcome back, internet sleuths and moral compasses! Today's AITA submission is a real jaw-dropper, pushing the boundaries of workplace drama into territory most of us wouldn't even dare to imagine. Get ready for a tale of ambition, sabotage, and a ruthless climb up the corporate ladder that might just leave you speechless. This one certainly had our team gasping at every turn.
Our original poster, let's call them 'The Opportunist,' lays out a plan so meticulously Machiavellian, it almost reads like a spy thriller. They weren't just gunning for a promotion; they actively engineered a downfall. The question isn't just 'Are they the A-hole?' but 'How far is too far in the pursuit of success?' Prepare yourselves for a truly wild ride.

"AITA for planting fake financial evidence in my coworker’s company email, then tipping off management anonymously so she was fired and I took her position?"





This story is a stark reminder that ambition, unchecked by ethics, can lead down incredibly dark paths. The Original Poster (OP) didn't just compete for a job; they actively orchestrated the professional downfall of a coworker, Sarah. The actions described – planting fake evidence and anonymously tipping off management – are not merely unethical; they border on illegal, involving potential fraud and cyber-tampering. The severity of this transgression cannot be overstated.
From a purely objective standpoint, the OP’s actions directly caused Sarah to lose her job, tarnished her professional reputation, and potentially hindered her future career prospects. While OP claims Sarah was 'complacent,' this subjective assessment does not justify such a calculated act of sabotage. Every employee deserves fair treatment and a merit-based evaluation, not a fabricated conspiracy designed to remove them from contention.
The OP’s rationalization that they are 'excelling' in the role and that 'the company is better for it' is a self-serving justification that completely dismisses the moral and ethical implications of their conduct. The end does not justify the means, especially when those means involve malicious deception and harm to another individual. Such a mindset can be dangerous in any professional environment.
Ultimately, the question of 'Are they the A-hole?' seems almost rhetorical here. The deliberate, premeditated nature of the sabotage, leading to a coworker's termination under false pretenses, paints a clear picture. The OP’s actions are a textbook example of extreme manipulation and unethical behavior in the workplace, undeniably earning them the 'A-hole' label in the court of public opinion.
The Internet Weighs In: A Storm of Indignation and Moral Outrage!
The comment section exploded, as expected, with a resounding 'YTA' verdict. Readers were utterly shocked by the brazenness of the Original Poster's actions, with many calling it one of the most egregious AITA submissions they'd ever seen. The sheer premeditation and ruthlessness left many users questioning not just the OP's ethics, but their overall character and capacity for empathy. The consensus was clear: this wasn't just workplace competition; it was outright criminal.
Beyond the immediate judgment, many comments delved into the potential legal repercussions the OP could face if Sarah were to ever discover the truth. Users discussed everything from wrongful termination lawsuits to charges of fraud and even cybercrimes. There was a strong sentiment that karma would eventually catch up, and that building a career on such deceit was a ticking time bomb. The community truly struggled to find any justification for the OP's actions.



So, there you have it. This AITA submission stands out as a chilling reminder of the lengths some individuals will go to achieve their ambitions. The internet's verdict is overwhelmingly clear: the Original Poster is unequivocally the A-hole. The story sparked a fierce debate about ethics, ambition, and the very real consequences of workplace sabotage. It leaves us with a lingering question: is any professional gain truly worth the destruction of another's career and the complete abandonment of one's moral compass?
